Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Kennet (Labour). It was answered by Baroness Trumpington (Conservative) on Monday, 16 July 1990.
Oral question
- Question
- Whether genetically engineered hormone BST would, if licensed, qualify as a "state of the art" product, liability for compensation for damage from which would not fall on the manufacturers
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 521 c742-3
- Session
- 1989-90
- Oral question type
- Lead
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Cattle Licensing Liability Hormone treatments Bovine somatotropin
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-04-12 00:54:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_106022
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_106022
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_106022