Written question asked by Bill Wiggin (Conservative) on Wednesday, 2 November 2005, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 7 November 2005. It was answered by Elliot Morley (Labour) on Thursday, 10 November 2005 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Food Defences
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate she has made of the costs of cleaning up flood damage in each year since 1997.
- Answer
-
The costs of cleaning up are borne in the main by local authorities and individual property owners and their insurers. No estimates of the total costs incurred by all parties involved are available.However, under the Bellwin schemes arrangements, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister makes financial assistance available to local authorities if there has been an emergency or disaster involving destruction of or danger to life or property on a scale which is clearly exceptional in relation to normal experience in the locality. The purpose of a Bellwin scheme is to provide emergency relief, not to put right all the ill effects of an incident. Before qualifying for grant a LA must have spent 0.2 per cent. of its budget on eligible expenditure. Above that threshold grant is normally paid at 85 per cent.Records of expenditure on Bellwin Schemes do not differentiate as to the cause of the emergency. The following statistics of expenditure since 1997–98 therefore include payments relating to all emergencies. However, the majority of the expenditure related to flooding emergencies:
£ million 1997–98 0.3 1998–99 0.44 1999–2000 0.35 2000–01 4.1 2001–02 25 2002–03 0.35 2003–04 0.1 2004–05 2.3 Notes: Up until 2000–01 and again in 2002–03 only a small number of authorities received grant in any one year. In 2000–01, 17 authorities received grant, 16 of which were in connection with the autumn 2000 floods. In 2001–02 nearly 75 authorities received payments which were also in connection with the autumn 2000 floods, and nearly 50 in connection with foot and mouth disease. In 2001–02, around £6 million of the total expenditure was in relation to foot and mouth disease.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 25460; 439 c674-5W;439 c674-5W
- Session
- 2005-06
- Subjects
- Costs Flood control Government assistance Floods
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 12:33:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1078732
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1078732
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1078732