Written question asked by Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat) on Wednesday, 22 March 2006, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 27 March 2006. It was answered by Alun Michael (Labour) on Thursday, 20 April 2006 on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry.
Telephone Service Providers
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many complaints about telephone cold calling were made against (a) the Labour party, (b) the Conservative party, (c) the Scottish National party and (d) the Green party since the introduction of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) 2003; and on how many occasions the Information Commissioner has initiated formal action in response to these complaints.
- Answer
-
The Information Commissioner is responsible for administering the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. Regulation 21 of these regulations relates to unsolicited direct marketing telephone calls. It should be noted that complaints received by his office about breaches of Regulation 21 concern not just calls made to Telephone Preference Service (TPS) registered numbers but also calls made to numbers where the subscriber has directly asked the calling organisation not to make marketing calls to that number. Also, Regulation 19 relates to the use of unsolicited direct marketing automated telephone calls.The number of complaints about telephone cold calling made against the parties since the introduction of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) in 2003 is as follows:
Number (a) Labour party Total Regulation 19 complaints 16 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 0 Total Regulation 21 complaints 4 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (b) Conservative party Total Regulation 19 complaints 5 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 5 Total Regulation 21 complaints 8 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (c) Scottish National party Total Regulation 19 complaints 5 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 5 Total Regulation 21 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (d) Green party Total Regulation 19 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 0 Total Regulation 21 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (e) Liberal Democrats Total Regulation 19 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 0 Total Regulation 21 complaints 1 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (f) UKIP Total Regulation 19 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 0 Total Regulation 21 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (g) Plaid Cymru Total Regulation 19 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 0 Total Regulation 21 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 (h) Respect Total Regulation 19 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints 0 Total Regulation 21 complaints 0 ‘Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints 0 Note: The term ‘Upheld' also includes cases where the Information Commissioner decided that enforcement action was not appropriate even though there may have been some breach of the regulations. (7) In 2005 the Information Commissioner issued one enforcement notice under Regulation 19 against the Conservative party. (8) In 2005 the Information Commissioner issued one enforcement notice under Regulation 19 against the Scottish National party.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 61652; 445 c764-5W;445 c764-5W
- Session
- 2005-06
- Subjects
- Complaints Direct marketing Political parties Telephone services Telephones Unsolicited goods and services
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2016-08-08 13:05:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1126841
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1126841
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1126841