Written question asked by Baroness Featherstone (Liberal Democrat) on Wednesday, 12 April 2006, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 18 April 2006. It was answered by Bridget Prentice (Labour) on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 on behalf of the Department for Constitutional Affairs.
Electoral Register (Christchurch/East Dorset)
- Question
- To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs (1) for what reasons the (a) Christchurch and (b) East Dorset constituency was omitted from the answer given on30 November 2005, Official Report, column 642W;
- Answer
-
The contractors for the 2005 General Election electoral documents storage, and administration of the marked registers viewing and copying service, have informed officials from my Department that they have no record of receiving any reports suggesting that Christchurch constituency had pages missing from its marked register.There is no constituency of East Dorset. The Dorset constituencies are as follows:"Mid Dorset and Poole North""North Dorset""South Dorset""West Dorset"Of these constituencies, North Dorset has been identified as having pages missing from its 2005 marked electoral register, and this was included in the answer given on 30 November.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 64464; 446 c366-7W
- Session
- 2005-06
- Related items
- Subjects
- Electoral register Dorset
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 15:31:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1131086
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1131086
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1131086