Skip to main content

Written question asked by Graham Allen (Labour) on Wednesday, 25 October 2006, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 30 October 2006. It was answered by Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour) on Monday, 6 November 2006 on behalf of the Department for Education and Skills.


Literacy

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which 10 local education authorities have the poorest levels of literacy for those aged (a) five, (b) 11 and (c) 16 years.
Answer

The information requested is set out as follows:(a) 5-year-oldsThe available information for the ““Communication, Language and Literacy”” area of learning is shown in the following table. Local authority figures for 2005 were published as an annex (Table B) to the final Statistical First Release ““Foundation Stage Profile: 2005 National Results”” (SFR 03/2006) in February 2006.

The lowest 10 attaining local authorities by percentage of children working securely¹,² within the Early Learning Goals in the communication, language and literacy area of learning—2005
Percentage
Language for communication and thinking
Reading
Writing
Barking and Dagenham 46
Slough 59
Middlesbrough 63
Leicester 63
Hartlepool 65
Kingston Upon Hull, City of 67
Greenwich 67
Rotherham 68
Tower Hamlets 68
Torbay 69
Linking sounds and letters
Barking and Dagenham 28
Middlesbrough 43
Leicester 43
Greenwich 43
Nottingham 43
Waltham Forest 44
Lewisham 46
Luton 46
Newham 50
Kingston Upon Hull, City of 51
Barking and Dagenham 44
Middlesbrough 48
Leicester 48
Greenwich 52
Hartlepool 56
Waltham Forest 57
Newham 57
Kingston Upon Hull, City of 57
Lewisham 58
Slough 58
Barking and Dagenham 28
Middlesbrough 39
Leicester 41
North Somerset 41
Kingston Upon Hull, City of 43
Greenwich 44
Southampton 45
Luton 45
Reading 47
Medway 47
¹ Care should be taken when comparing the relative attainment levels between local authorities because of the unequal impact of moderation and assessment on the figures. ² A scale score of six or more indicates that a child is working securely within the Early Learning Goals.

The provisional national figures for 2006 recently published on 26 October 2006 in Statistical First Release ““Foundation Stage Profile 2006: National Results 2006 (Provisional)”” (SFR42/2006) suggest that improvements in assessments and moderation may still be impacting widely on the results across the country. Final local authority data are expected to be published in January.(b) 11-year-oldsNational Curriculum assessments at key stage 2 were published on 24 August 2006 (SFR31/2006). The following table shows the percentage of pupils achieving the target level 4 in English in the 10 lowest ranking local authorities.

Provisional key stage 2 National Curriculum test results—2006
LA name Percentage of pupils achieving Level 4+ English
City of London 64
Hackney 70
Nottingham City 70
Leicester City 71
Manchester 72
Barnsley 72
Sheffield 72
Stoke-on-Trent 72
City of Bristol 73
City of Kingston upon Hull 73
England all schools 79

(c ) 16-year-oldsThe following table shows provisional figures for the percentage of 16 year old pupils achieving a grade A*- C in GCSE English in 2006.

Provisional GCSE results—2006
LA name Percentage of 16 year olds achieving grades A* to C in GCSE English
Knowsley 36.6
City of Kingston upon Hull 38.9
Nottingham City 39.9
Middlesbrough 40.9
Manchester 42.2
Sandwell 43.4
City of Bristol 43.6
Portsmouth 43.7
Tower Hamlets 44.6
Walsall 45.1
England all schools key stage 4 59

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
451 c963-5W; 98057
Session
2005-06
Subjects
Children Literacy
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk