Written question asked by Hugh Bayley (Labour) on Wednesday, 15 November 2006, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 20 November 2006. It was answered by Lord Coaker (Labour) on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 on behalf of the Home Office.
Crime and Disorder Partnerships
- Question
- (2) how much funding each local authority in Yorkshire and the Humber has granted to Crime and Disorder Partnerships in each of the last five years.
- Answer
-
Home Office allocations made to all Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs) in Yorkshire and The Humber since 2002-03 are set out in the tables.Since 2005-06, the Building Safer Communities Fund and the Anti-Social Behaviour Co-ordinators Grant have formed part of the Safer and Stronger Communities Fund.This is a pooled budget with contributions from the Home Office and the Department for Communities and Local Government.These figures exclude any funding allocated to CDRPs that has been targeted at certain areas, such as the Street Crime Initiative and the Tackling Violent Crime Programme, and any discretionary allocations made by the Regional Director. This data is not held centrally or would be available only at disproportionate cost.Information on any funding granted to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships by local authorities or received from local authorities and other sources is not collected centrally.
Home Office contribution to the safer stronger communities fund England 2006-07 Government Office or Yorkshire and Humber—Government allocations to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships 2002-03 Safer Communities Initiative and Communities Against Drugs Funding (predecessors of Building Safer Communities Fund) Region Top Tier Authority CDRPs included in Top Tier Revenue Capital Total Revenue payable Total Capital payable Total payable YH Barnsley 272,224 — 272,224 — 272,224 YH Bradford 677,269 — 677,269 — 677,269 YH Calderdale 282,513 — 282,513 — 282,513 YH Kingston upon Hull 526,328 — 526,328 — 526,328 YH Doncaster 361,265 — 361,265 — 361,265 YH North Yorkshire Craven 57,584 — 57,584 — 57,584 YH Hambleton 84,155 — 84,155 — 84,155 YH Harrogate 130,352 — 130,352 — 130,352 YH Richmondshire 68,240 — 68,240 — 68,240 YH Ryedale 62,371 — 62,371 — 62,371 YH Scarborough 121,401 — 121,401 — 121,401 YH Selby 84,087 — 84,087 — 84,087 YH Kirklees 521,286 — 521,286 — 521,286 YH Leeds 1,269,478 — 1,269,478 — 1,269,478 YH NE Lincolnshire 267,610 — 267,610 — 267,610 YH Rotherham 288,381 — 288,381 — 288,381 YH Sheffield 685,090 — 685,090 — 685,090 YH Wakefield 378,712 — 378,712 — 378,712 YH East Riding 264,120 — 264,120 — 264,120 YH North Lincolnshire 183,353 — 183,353 — 183,353 YH York 217,837 — 217,837 — 217,837
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 453 c636-8W; 100953
- Session
- 2006-07
- Subjects
- Finance Crime and disorder reduction partnerships
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 17:37:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1183989
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1183989
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1183989