Written question asked by David Ruffley (Conservative) on Monday, 15 January 2007, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 17 January 2007. It was answered by James Plaskitt (Labour) on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions.
Benefit Fraud
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the savings to his Department from detected benefit fraud were in each year since 1997, broken down by benefit.
- Answer
-
The information requested is not available by individual benefit and comparable information is only available since 1999-2000. The available information is set out in the following tables. The figures in the tables represent the amount of fraud actually detected by the Department’s officials, and reflect the monetary value of adjustment (MVA).The MVA is the difference between the weekly amount of benefit that would have been paid or would have continued to be paid, and the benefit actually paid following the decision maker’s decision on the information gathered. It includes both increases and decreases. The MVA scheme was introduced from 1 April 1999.Instrument of Payment fraudDue to the increase in the number of customers who are paid by direct payment (around 98 per cent. of our customers are now paid in this way, compared to around 34 per cent. in 1999), there has been a very large reduction in the amount of Instrument of Payment fraud, as shown in the following table:
Instrument of Payment MVA (£) 1999-2000 20,470,863 2000-01 15,302,840 2001-02 9,322,117 2002-03 9,217,555 2003-04 7,916,299 2004-05 4,474,984 2005-06 2,824,939 General Matching ServiceDWP can data match information from across a number of sources, to check:"Whether customers continue to be entitled for benefit; or""That customers’ benefit is being paid correctly."Data matching enables the Department to find inconsistencies in information and therefore identify where people are committing fraud (in addition to identifying customer and official error). For example, if someone was paying national insurance contributions on earned income at a time when their benefit claim showed that they had no earnings, clearly something is wrong.The MVA in respect of the Department’s General Matching Service is as follows, and shows the increased success of various data matching exercises in detecting fraud:
General Matching Service MVA (£) 1999-2000 951,885 2000-01 1,034,865 2001-02 1,340,080 2002-03 1,672,893 2003-04 1,577,042 2004-05 1,056,966 2005-06 1,324,906 Other benefit fraudBenefit fraud MVA not including MVA from Instrument of Payment fraud and General Matching Service fraud is as shown in the following table.
Benefit fraud MVA (£) 1999-2000 6,561,497 2000-01 5,771,922 2001-02 5,720,786 2002-03 5,167,365 2003-04 5,095,564 2004-05 5,190,263 2005-06 5,104,595
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 116593; 459 c1081-3W
- Session
- 2006-07
- Subjects
- Fraud Social security benefits
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 18:22:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1202017
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1202017
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1202017