Parliamentary Search

Written question asked by Justine Greening (Conservative) on Monday, 5 March 2007, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 8 March 2007. It was answered by Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour) on Friday, 9 March 2007 on behalf of the Home Office.

Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many intensive supervision and surveillance programmes (ISSP) were attached to court sentences for (a) community rehabilitation orders, (b) bail, (c) supervision orders, (d) community rehabilitation orders and supervision orders following bail ISSP and (e) detention and training orders in each year since 2001; and if he will make a statement.
Answer

[holding answer 8 March 2007]: Data on the intensive supervision and surveillance programme (ISSP) is produced by the Youth Justice Board based on returns from ISSP teams. The information requested is set out in the following table. These are not Home Office data and although care is taken in collating and analysing the returns used to compile the figures, the data are of necessity subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale recording system.

Financial year Bail SO CRO SO/CRO DTO Sec 90/91 Total
2001-02 131 579 34 — 132 — 876
2002-03 773 1,685 177 — 518 — 3,153
2003-04 1,451 2,081 290 — 883 — 4,705
2005-06 1,419 298 2,112 135 966 30 4,960
2006-07 1,573 285 2,242 214 1,198 56 5,568
2006-07 1,110 214 1,619 120 704 63 3,830
6,457 5,142 6,474 469 4,401 149 23,092
Note:
SO/CRO and Sec 90/91 routes were added from 04-05 financial year

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
457 c2326-7W;457 c2312-3W; 126102
Session
2006-07
Subjects
Intensive supervision and surveillance programme
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk