Oral answer to question provided on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 in the House of Lords, by Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour).
Millennium Dome
- Answer
-
My Lords, we had a debate about IT projects in which I was able to identify the many successes that the Government recorded as well as some weaknesses. The only common factors between those and the Millennium Dome are that they are large and public. The Dome was a unique development. We all know that there were lessons to be learnt from it. As I have indicated, not only have we learnt the lessons, but we intend to implement them with regard to the Olympic development.
This is an answer to the Oral question asked on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 by Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative).
- Question
- My Lords, bearing in mind the reported overspend of £23 billion in the past 10 years on just a handful of projects, including the huge amounts that were wasted on failed IT projects and the recent chaos in the allocation of places for doctors, will the Government, who have been described as not being able to manage huge projects, in future consult those with a proven commercial track record instead of wasting so much on consultants?
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral answer to question
- Reference
- 694 c129
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Millennium dome
- Link
- View this Oral answer to question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-09-01 22:28:01 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1253044/answer
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1253044/answer
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1253044/answer