Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Harman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 26 July 2007. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

I think it is important that we recognise the different roles of the Modernisation and Procedure Committees although they often work closely together, and I pay tribute to the work of both Committees in making suggestions that have improved the way the House operates. I hope that will continue to be the case. The hon. Gentleman questioned there being a written statement yesterday on local government issues by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. It is the usual practice for such issues to be dealt with in written statements. Yesterday, we had important oral statements on terrorism and the commissioning of aircraft carriers and it was right that they were oral statements to the House. There is a hierarchy: oral statements and then, if something is not appropriate for an oral statement, written statements. Above all, however, information should be given to the House first. I am clear in my own mind that it is important for information to be given to the House. It is strange that some Members seem to say that we are having too many written ministerial statements, or indeed too many oral statements. It is a challenge for the business of the House when we want to make important oral and written statements before the House rises, but the most important thing is accountability to the House.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
463 c1059-60 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Local government Parliamentary procedure Reorganisation Modernisation Committee Procedure Committee Written statements
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk