Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Trefgarne (Conservative). It was answered on Tuesday, 29 January 2008.


Falkland Islands: Unexploded Ordnance

Question
My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for that reply. Is it not the case that in addition to the technology currently available to deal with this matter, there are also international obligations upon the combatant nations? Will that be part of the consideration that she has referred to?
Answer

Yes, my Lords. As noble Lords—certainly the noble Lord, Lord Trefgarne—will know, the UK is a state party to the Ottawa convention and its obligations, and we are very well aware of them. A feasibility study was concluded in October. The UK is now considering options before deciding on next steps. Since the end of hostilities in 1982, the landmines have been clearly marked, fenced off and monitored, and there have been no civilian casualties.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
698 c544 
Session
2007-08
Oral question type
1st Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Armed conflict Bomb disposal Landmines Falkland Islands Argentina
Link
View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk