Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Trefgarne (Conservative). It was answered on Tuesday, 29 January 2008.
Falkland Islands: Unexploded Ordnance
- Question
- My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for that reply. Is it not the case that in addition to the technology currently available to deal with this matter, there are also international obligations upon the combatant nations? Will that be part of the consideration that she has referred to?
- Answer
-
Yes, my Lords. As noble Lords—certainly the noble Lord, Lord Trefgarne—will know, the UK is a state party to the Ottawa convention and its obligations, and we are very well aware of them. A feasibility study was concluded in October. The UK is now considering options before deciding on next steps. Since the end of hostilities in 1982, the landmines have been clearly marked, fenced off and monitored, and there have been no civilian casualties.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 698 c544
- Session
- 2007-08
- Oral question type
- 1st Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Armed conflict Bomb disposal Landmines Falkland Islands Argentina
- Link
- View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-09-01 21:49:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1295883/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1295883/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1295883/-question