Business question from Peter Bone (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 May 2008. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.
Business of the House
Yesterday, the ““Yes Minister”” Bill received its Second Reading, having been debated for two hours and 44 minutes, leaving more than three and a half hours of unused debating time. On the previous day, as the Leader of the House has said, the House was at its best when it considered amendments on abortion in respect of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, but that debate lasted for only three hours, with many Members unable to contribute. Was that incompatibility of debating time a deliberate ploy by the Government to curtail debate or was it just another Government cock-up?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 476 c411-2
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Parliamentary scrutiny Timetabling of bills
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:18:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1328638/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1328638/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1328638/-question