Skip to main content

Business question from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 4 December 2008. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

I had hoped that after your helpful statement yesterday, Mr. Speaker, the Leader of the House would have taken the opportunity to bring the parties together on the issue. Nevertheless, the motion before us today appears to be taking the mickey. Having said that, let me return to the point that my hon. Friend the Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) raised, which concerns the other constitutional issue that we should be discussing. Our primary responsibility in the House is the control of supply—the control of taxation—yet just before Prorogation, we were presented not just with a Budget, but to all intents and purposes with a radical Budget, on which we had no debate except for your agency, Mr. Speaker, and no opportunity to vote. Is the House doing its duty on behalf of the British people—a duty set out in the Bill of Rights—to ensure that there is no taxation without parliamentary consent?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
485 c127 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Parliamentary scrutiny Taxation Pre-Budget report 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk