Skip to main content

Business question from Nicholas Winterton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 April 2009. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

In supporting the views expressed by my hon. Friend the Member for South Staffordshire (Sir Patrick Cormack), my right hon. Friend the Member for North-West Hampshire (Sir George Young) and the hon. Member for Walsall, North (Mr. Winnick), may I ask how we can enter into the debate on Thursday when the proposed per diem allowance will be no more transparent than the present arrangement? It will not deal with Members who are away carrying out duties with the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the Inter-Parliamentary Union or the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, or other parliamentary duties, but who still have to maintain accommodation in London. Furthermore, no mention has been made of how Members will pay for the accommodation that they have to maintain during the summer recess, when no per diem will be paid. This really is absolute nonsense. As many people have said, the proposal appears to have been decided after writing a few notes on the back of an envelope.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
491 c378 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Allowances Members
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk