Skip to main content

Written question asked by Tim Loughton (Conservative) on Friday, 24 April 2009, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 29 April 2009. It was answered by Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour) on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 on behalf of the Department for Children, Schools and Families.


Children: Protection

Question
(2) on what date he received each of the 118 serious case reviews subsequent to 31 March 2007;
Answer

[holding answer 29 April 2009]: Officials follow up all outstanding copies of serious case review reports. We do not hold a record of the dates on which copies of the serious case review reports that have been passed to researchers for inclusion in the 2005-07 biennial overview report. The following table sets out the date of receipt of copies of the serious case review reports received subsequent to those included in the 2005-07 biennial overview report as at 22 April 2009.

Local authority Date copy of anonymised full SCR received¹ as at 22 April 2009
Barnet 4 November 2008
Birmingham 17 March 2008
17 March 2008
23 April 2008
8 October 2008
20 March 2009
20 March 2009
Blackburn with Darwen UA 25 July 2008
16 October 2008
8 December 2008
8 December 2008
Bournemouth UA 3 November 2008
6 November 2008
1 December 2008
22 April 2009
Bradford 16 October 2008
16 October 2008
Bristol, City of UA 15 July 2008
Bromley 16 December 2008
22 August 2008
Calderdale 20 October 2008
22 December 2008
Cambridgeshire 16 February 2009
Camden 3 October 2008
20 January 2009
Coventry 21 July 2008
21 July 2008
21 July 2008
27 March 2009
Croydon 27 February 2008
27 February 2008
Cumbria 10 February 2008
Devon 3 November 2008
Doncaster 25 February 2009
Dudley 20 February 2009
Durham 28 May 2008
East Sussex 12 February 2009
Enfield 8 October 2008
27 January 2009
30 January 2009
Essex 15 December 2008
14 April 2009
Gloucestershire 12 February 2009
Halton UA 16 March 2009
Hampshire 18 March 2008
28 July 2008
18 August 2008
2 April 2009
Haringey 12 November 2008
3 March 2009
Hounslow 4 November 2008
Isle of Wight UA 6 May 2008
Kent 21 April 2008
21 April 2008
21 April 2008
23 September 2008
5 December 2008
5 December 2008
Kingston upon Thames 7 March 2008
4 November 2008
Kirklees 29 September 2008
8 October 2008
14 April 2009
Lambeth 4 November 2008
Manchester 3 June 2008
Milton Keynes UA 18 February 2009
Newham 11 February 2009
North Tyneside 1 December 2008
North Yorkshire 11 January 2009
Northamptonshire 13 June 2008
14 October 2008
Nottinghamshire 19 June 2008
Oxfordshire 3 November 2008
Plymouth UA 6 October 2008
Poole UA 25 November 2008
Portsmouth UA 31 December 2008
Reading UA 14 October 2008
Redbridge 8 October 2008
Rochdale 18 December 2007
25 February 2008
Salford 8 April 2009
Sandwell 21 July 2008
1 December 2008
8 December 2008
Sefton 1 August 2008
1 August 2008
Sheffield 19 November 2008
25 November 2008
Somerset 06 January 2009
06 January 2009
South Gloucestershire UA 17 April 2009
South Tyneside 15 May 2008
21 May 2008
16 September 2008
Southwark 24 January 2008
6 March 2009
St. Helens 6 March 2009
6 March 2009
Stockport 4 July 2008
Stockton-on-Tees UA 6 April 2009
Suffolk 12 January 2008
1 December 2008
5 February 2008
25 February 2008
Sunderland 20 February 2009
Surrey 8 November 2007
20 March 2009
20 March 2009
Thurrock UA 1 June 2008
Torbay UA 2 April 2009
Tower Hamlets 1 December 2008
Wakefield 1 May 2008
13 January 2009
24 March 2009
Waltham Forest 31 October 2008
Westminster 24 February 2009
Wolverhampton 19 August 2008
York UA 11 January 2009
¹ Multiple dates indicate more than one SCR report

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
493 c432-5W; 271841
Session
2008-09
Subjects
Children Protection
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk