Skip to main content

Oral answer to question provided on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 in the House of Commons, by Hazel Blears (Labour), Department for Communities and Local Government.


Topical Questions

Answer

As I remember, the last time the hon. Gentleman raised the issue he had a particular fanciable pigeon in mind; I have forgotten its name. I can say to him that I did personally take up the issue and find out why pigeon racing was not defined as a sport. Apparently it is because the owners do not take part in any physical activity. [Laughter.] If they ran behind the pigeons, it could be a sport. In terms of empowering the pigeon fanciers, perhaps I can suggest to him that they might like to draw up a petition, so that we can see whether we can take action on the issue.

This is an answer to the Topical question asked on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 by Richard Ottaway (Conservative).

Question
May I raise with the Secretary of State an issue that I have raised before—the recognition of pigeon racing as a sport? Of course, the significance as far as her Department is concerned, is that if it is not a sport, pigeon-racing premises have to pay business rates. She may not be aware that the application of the Royal Pigeon Racing Association for pigeon racing to become a sport has been rejected by Sport England. Will she, on behalf of the pigeon fanciers of Croydon and Salford, join me in supporting an appeal, so that our pigeon fanciers can get the deal that they deserve?

Secondary information

Type
Oral answer to question
Reference
493 c160 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Business rates Pigeon racing
Link
View this Oral answer to question on www.publications.parliament.uk