Written question asked by Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat) on Tuesday, 21 July 2009, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 12 October 2009. It was answered by Alan Johnson (Labour) on Thursday, 5 November 2009 on behalf of the Home Office.
Vetting
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of (a) standard checks and (b) enhanced checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau were the subject of a dispute by (i) the applicant and (ii) an employer in each year since 1997.
- Answer
-
[holding answer 12 October 2009]: The table details the number checks undertaken by the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) which were the subject of a dispute since the launch of the disclosure service in 2002.Information is not held to enable a breakdown of the number or percentage of disputes that relate to either the applicant or the employer.
Disclosure type Total number of disputes Total number of disclosures issued Percentage of disputes 2002-03 1,111 1,437,094 0.077 2003-04 1,887 2,284,688 0.082 2004-05 2,291 2,430,937 0.094 2005-06 2,379 2,770,265 0.085 2006-07 2,112 3,277,957 0.064 2007-08 2,288 3,323,251 0.068 2008-09 2,509 3,855,881 0.065 2009-10 743 1,747,710 0.042 The contents of a disclosure can be disputed for a number of reasons, such as:"The record relates to someone with the same details as the applicant and based on the information available the CRB was unable to dissociate the applicant from the record.""Where locally held information is released the applicant feels it is either inaccurate, misleading or is otherwise inaccurate in the opinion of the applicant and as a result the police agree to amend the information.""Where someone has had their identity stolen or cloned."CRB quality assurance procedures are targeted at eliminating errors. In 2008-09, the accuracy rate for CRB Disclosures was 99.96 per cent.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 498 c1145-6W; 290332
- Session
- 2008-09
- Subjects
- Vetting
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-26 01:32:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1444216
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1444216
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1444216