Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Christopher Chope (Conservative). It was answered on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 on behalf of the Department of Health.


Smoking Cessation

Question
What an arrogant and irresponsible reply that is. Does the Minister not realise that based on the Swedish experience, if snus were legalised in the United Kingdom it would save up to 30,000 lives a year? Does she not realise that even the World Health Organisation recognises snus as a useful harm reduction product?
Answer

I am sorry to disappoint the hon. Gentleman, but there are very good reasons for my comments. The Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, which is both official and independent and provides the European Commission with scientific advice, considered in detail the health effects of smokeless tobacco products and concluded that such products were addictive. I have myself looked at the packaging of such items and seen that even the tobacco industry acknowledges that they are not a safe alternative to cigarettes.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
501 c387-8 
Session
2009-10
Oral question type
1st Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Smoking
Link
View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk