Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Tom Levitt (Labour). It was answered on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 on behalf of the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.
Charities (Regulatory Burden)
- Question
- Is it not the case that the Charities Act 2006 brought rationalisation to the regulations governing the charities sector and therefore made it much easier, in many ways, for them to function? Is it not also the case that where third sector organisations are delivering other services such as hospices and so on, they must be regulated in terms of the service that they are delivering? What is important, therefore, is not the quantity but the quality of the regulation that we have imposed.
- Answer
-
My hon. Friend, who has vast knowledge of the charitable sector, makes a valid point. This is a matter of balance. We need to ensure that there is adequate regulation to protect donors’ money and the services that they provide, but we do not want to overburden those organisations with unnecessary regulation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 504 c798-9
- Session
- 2009-10
- Oral question type
- Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Regulation
- Link
- View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-01 15:08:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1490445/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1490445/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1490445/-question