Skip to main content

Written question asked by Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative) on Friday, 29 January 2010, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 2 February 2010. It was answered by Claire Ward (Labour) on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.


Theft: Milton Keynes

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people resident in Milton Keynes were convicted of an offence of (a) handling stolen goods and (b) fraud and forgery in each year since 1997.
Answer

Information showing the number of persons found guilty of (a) handling stolen goods and (b) fraud and forgery in each year between 1997 and 2008 (latest available) in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System area, broken down by age group, from 1997 to 2008 (latest available) is shown in the following tables.

Number of persons found guilty at all courts in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System area for offences of handling stolen goods and fraud and forgery, by age group, from 1997 to 2008¹, ²
Number of offenders
Type of offence: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Handling stolen goods
Persons
10 to 11 — — — — — — — — 1 — — —
12 to 14 8 8 8 17 10 17 8 5 8 9 8 4
15 to 17 43 60 76 65 71 72 44 39 49 35 35 33
18 to 20 110 105 103 116 83 82 57 51 42 50 44 42
21 and over 314 330 311 249 247 286 259 199 212 169 178 170
Total 475 503 498 447 411 457 368 294 312 263 265 249
Number of offenders
Type of offence: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Fraud and forgery
Persons
10 to 11 — — — — — — — — 1 — — —
12 to 14 2 1 2 1 — 6 3 2 3 — 8 —
15 to 17 16 28 18 19 30 15 24 24 17 16 22 10
18 to 20 75 72 75 66 61 64 61 56 67 46 48 49
21 and over 326 337 355 391 411 395 437 420 496 578 544 554
Total 419 438 450 477 502 480 525 502 584 640 622 613
¹ The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
² Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice.

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
505 c948W; 315371
Session
2009-10
Subjects
Crime Convictions Fraud Forgery Milton Keynes
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk