Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Martin Linton (Labour). It was answered on Thursday, 4 February 2010 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.


Dangerous Dogs

Question
My hon. Friend saw during his visit to Battersea that almost half of all the dogs that are admitted are Staffies or Bull-breed crosses. Most have to be put down even though they are of sound temperament, because back-street breeders are selling puppies in pubs—often to complete strangers—for £250. Does he accept that the dog control laws are no longer fit for purpose, and will he institute a review looking not only at the Bateson report, but at compulsory microchipping, a minimum age for dog ownership and some form of registration for breeders?
Answer

I cannot agree to the call for a review, because I understand that that has formal implications in respect of the procedures of the House, but I can assure my hon. Friend that the Bateson report will inform Government policy on this important issue. Recent tragic attacks have demonstrated that these very dangerous dogs still present a danger in ordinary people's homes, so we do need to look at the issue, and I agree with my hon. Friend that the Bateson report gives us an opportunity to do so.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
505 c446 
Session
2009-10
Oral question type
1st Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Dangerous dogs
Link
View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk