Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Jane Kennedy (Labour). It was answered on Thursday, 25 March 2010 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Dangerous Dogs
- Question
- In the horrific case of John Paul Massey in my constituency, focusing on the breed disrupted and undermined the partnership that needs to work between a housing association and the police when the public report concerns the behaviour of dogs. Chipping dogs and encouraging owners to be trained in ownership, not focusing on the breed, is the way forward.
- Answer
-
There is a great deal of sense in the comments of my right hon. Friend, who sadly has experience of this matter, through the constituency case to which she referred. In the end my concern, and I think that of the House, is that we come up with a set of proposals that will help to deal with the remaining problem. Certainly, some people argue that spending time looking at the features of a particular dog to determine whether it falls within the four categories in the original legislation might not necessarily be the most sensible approach. That is one of the questions that we have raised in the consultation paper.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 508 c360
- Session
- 2009-10
- Oral question type
- Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Dangerous dogs
- Link
- View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-01 15:18:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1508658/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1508658/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1508658/-question