Skip to main content

Business question from Caroline Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 September 2010. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

With the greatest respect to the Leader of the House, his answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Garston and Halewood (Maria Eagle) was completely irrelevant. The findings of the research on rape anonymity—we have been promised publication first before the recess, then in September, and now in October—are completely separate from the announcement by Her Majesty's inspectorate of constabulary, which has been badgered by the Home Office, that it will not look into the way in which victims are treated by police in rape cases. I think that the House deserves a debate on how we can secure better rape convictions, and how we can ensure that unnecessary cuts do not prevent that from happening. We have had assurances from the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, the Home Secretary and the Justice Secretary about the seriousness with which they take the issue, but this week's announcement in the press—not in the House—did not make that clear.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c1034 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Police Rape Victims Rights of accused
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk