Written question asked by Mark Tami (Labour) on Monday, 22 November 2010, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 24 November 2010. It was answered by Crispin Blunt (Conservative) on Monday, 29 November 2010 on behalf of the Ministry of Justice.
Dog Fouling
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many individuals were prosecuted for the offence of dog fouling in each local authority area in England in each of the last five years;
- Answer
-
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts in England for offences under section 3 of the Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996, from 2005 to 2009 (latest available) can be viewed in the table.Figures are presented for police force area in England as data held on the Ministry of Justice's Court Proceedings Database are not available at local authority area level.The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) advise that records on fixed penalty fines for the offence of dog fouling are not held centrally and would need to be obtained from each separate local authority.Court proceedings data for 2010 are planned for publication in spring 2011.
Number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences under section 3 of the Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996, by police force area, England, 2005-09¹, ², ³ Police force area 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avon and Somerset 11 11 5 7 5 Bedfordshire 2 — — — — Cambridgeshire — — 3 1 1 Cheshire 5 1 3 2 1 Cleveland 25 18 43 29 53 Cumbria 13 17 12 9 12 Derbyshire 13 14 11 9 6 Devon and Cornwall — 3 7 8 7 Dorset — 4 2 1 4 Durham — — 3 16 38 Essex 12 2 1 4 4 Gloucestershire 1 — 1 3 1 Greater Manchester 132 92 59 19 26 Hampshire 1 3 1 20 8 Hertfordshire 1 1 2 — — Humberside — — 2 — 1 Kent — — 1 16 24 Lancashire 37 19 27 27 59 Leicestershire 1 2 2 2 3 Lincolnshire 9 6 3 3 4 Merseyside 27 20 11 106 195 Metropolitan Police 47 49 25 48 29 Norfolk — 3 — — 1 North Yorkshire 3 5 7 3 4 Northamptonshire 5 2 1 6 6 Northumbria 48 59 57 50 61 Nottinghamshire 2 1 1 2 10 South Yorkshire 18 17 23 13 4 Staffordshire — — — 3 1 Suffolk 3 — — — — Surrey — — 1 — 1 Sussex — 1 1 2 15 Thames Valley 2 — — 1 4 Warwickshire 1 1 1 — 2 West Mercia — 1 1 1 1 West Midlands 2 10 2 4 8 West Yorkshire 7 6 4 14 26 Total 428 368 323 429 625 ¹ The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. ² Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. ³ Only those police force areas are shown where data have been reported. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 26516; 519 c492-4W
- Session
- 2010-12
- Subjects
- Dogs Litter
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-20 04:09:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1562149
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1562149
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1562149