Topical question asked in the House of Commons, by Chi Onwurah (Labour). It was answered on Thursday, 3 February 2011 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Topical Questions
- Question
- Kielder forest, which will provide the bulk of the income under the Government's plans to sell off our national heritage, is home to 31 sites of special scientific interest, as well as red squirrels and ospreys, yet the Government consultation classifies it simply as ““commercial””. What guarantees can the Secretary of State give us that the public interest and conservation interests will be met in perpetuity, given that the forest is classified as commercial?
- Answer
-
We need to be perfectly clear that Kielder forest is predominantly commercial, but that it retains within it sites of special scientific interest and other recreational amenities that will be protected by the conditions set in the leases—in addition to the legislation that protects such things—if that is the outcome that arises from the proposals under consultation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 522 c1032
- Session
- 2010-12
- Oral question type
- Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Sales Kielder Forest Dangerous dogs
- Link
- View this Topical question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2017-10-27 21:04:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1585000/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1585000/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1585000/-question