Prime Minister's question asked in the House of Commons, by Paul Flynn (Labour). It was answered on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 on behalf of the Prime Minister.
Nuclear Deterrent
- Question
- Why continue to waste billions on a national virility symbol that has played no part in any of the military operations that we have taken part in over the last seven years, and is unlikely to play any part in the future? Does it not give justification and encouragement to other countries in acquiring their own nuclear weapons?
- Answer
-
I do not accept either part of the hon. Gentleman's argument. First, we are signatories to the non-proliferation agreement and are strong supporters of it. Secondly, the point of our nuclear deterrent is just that—deterrence. It is the ultimate insurance policy against blackmail or attack by other countries. That is why I believe it is right to maintain and replace it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 528 c338
- Session
- 2010-12
- Oral question type
- Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Trident
- Link
- View this Prime Minister's question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-09-01 20:25:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616191/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616191/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616191/-question