Written question asked by Chris Williamson (Labour) on Wednesday, 29 June 2011, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 4 July 2011. It was answered by Robert Neill (Conservative) on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 on behalf of the Department for Communities and Local Government.

Fire Services: AssetCo

Question: (2) what assessment he has made of the potential (a) cost to and (b) organisational changes for (i) London Fire Brigade and (ii) Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Service arising from AssetCo's receipt of a creditor's petition;

Answer: Sharing back office functions and improving procurement are key ways that fire and rescue authorities can deliver sensible savings, while protecting the quality and breadth of frontline services offered to their communities.While each fire and rescue authority is responsible for their own policy on procurement, they should constantly search for the best value for money in delivering their services. Outsourcing the provision of capital equipment can be one such way, provided the precise terms and conditions of the contract represent value for money in the long-term. The terms of these contracts, and the implications of any service failure, are a matter for the individual fire and rescue authorities themselves. Contact has been made with London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority and Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Authority regarding AssetCo, and reassurance obtained that they are able to meet their statutory duties and ensure a continued service to the public irrespective of AssetCo's particular financial circumstances.

Secondary information