Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Borrie (Labour). It was answered on Monday, 12 September 2011.


Public Libraries: Closures

Question
I would like to think that the heart of the noble Baroness was in the right place but she has not actually indicated whether, for example, she agrees with me that public libraries are a vital asset for education and recreational purposes. Local authorities should regard them as of great importance, because being local is the essence of the thing. As the author Alan Bennett said the other day, it is no good people having a library if they have to go on an expedition in order to access the books. Does the noble Baroness agree that the public libraries Act imposes a statutory duty on the Secretary of State—and therefore, I suggest, Ministers and not just officials—to ensure that local authorities provide an effective and efficient library service?
Answer

My Lords, yes, I read that piece by Alan Bennett, which was absolutely right. The public libraries Act 1964, which the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, mentions, does say that there is a public duty to keep comprehensive and efficient libraries open. Of course, we know how important libraries are because we have the wonderful Library—even though it is private—here in the House of Lords, which is a treasured privilege. Most people understand that libraries are special places and not just facilities. They provide access to considerable electronic information as well as books.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
730 c495 
Session
2010-12
Oral question type
1st Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Closures Public libraries
Link
View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk