Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Stephen Dorrell (Conservative). It was answered on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 on behalf of the Department of Health.


Public Health Funding

Question
As we transfer public health responsibilities to local Government—something that has been very broadly welcomed—is it not important that in addition to a clear definition of the funds that are going to be transferred, subject to a ring fence, we also have a clear definition of the responsibilities that local authorities will be expected to discharge in the new world? When can we expect that definition to be put into the public arena?
Answer

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. Conditions will be attached to the ring-fenced money to determine how it can be spent, but any expenditure will need to refer to promoting or protecting public health. I hesitate to use the word ““shortly””, which the previous Government used on many occasions, but it will be published along with the outcomes framework. It is important that we get it right.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
536 c144-5 
Session
2010-12
Oral question type
Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Health Finance Public health
Link
View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk