Skip to main content

Written question asked by Alun Cairns (Conservative) on Monday, 16 January 2012, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 19 January 2012. It was answered by Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat) on Thursday, 19 January 2012 on behalf of the Department for Transport.


Railways: Theft

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) how many incidents there have been of theft of metal from railway lines in (a) England, (b) Wales and (c) Vale of Glamorgan constituency in each of the last three years;
Answer

The information is not available in the format requested. Details of the number and costs of incidents of cable theft which result in delays to the operational network are collected by Network Rail on a route basis.

Network Rail cable theft statistics—route and national 2008-09 to date
Network Rail breakdown by route 2010-11
Route Number of incidents Delay minutes¹ Compensation cost² (£)
Anglia 74 21,055 1,089,809
CTRL 1 31 7,251
East Midlands 33 11,234 282, 473
Kent 17 12,681 417,950
LNE (London North Eastern) 526 137,801 3,531,416
LNW (London North Western) 196 105,842 2,795,811
Scotland 34 7,265 254, 825
Sussex 3 764 30, 081
Wessex 8 3,536 140,423
Western 103 65,026 3,587, 181
Breakdown by route 2009-10
Route Number of incidents Delay minutes¹ Compensation cost² (£)
Anglia 79 40,632 2,643,979
CTRL 0 0 0
East Midlands 27 6,386 155,750
Kent 10 3,331 82,849
LNE (London North Eastern) 327 102,680 2,630,249
LNW (London North Western) 166 125,089 3,085,507
Scotland 2 142 13,974
Sussex 1 748 41,876
Wessex 3 71 1,738
Western 41 42, 491 2,275,430
Breakdown by route 2008-09
Route Number of incidents Delay minutes¹ Compensation cost² (£)
Anglia 26 12,253 720,251
CTRL 0 0 0
East Midlands 22 6,532 215,439
Kent 23 5,570 148,591
LNE (London North Eastern) 489 167,509 4,725,454
LNW (London North Western) 136 71,548 1,361,966
Scotland 10 4,396 212,450
Sussex 0 0 0
Wessex 1 12 163
Western 35 15,347 474,203
National
Financial year Number of incidents4 Delay minutes¹ Compensation cost² (£) Total cost³ (£)
2011-125 464 166,353 5,877,347 n/a
2010-11 995 365,265 12,137,220 16,510,663
2009-10 656 321,570 10,931,350 13,961,998
2008-09 742 283,167 7,858,516 12,264,682
Total 2,393 970,002 30,927,086 42,737,343
¹ Delay minutes provide an indication of the scale of inconvenience experienced by passengers and vary with each incident. If the theft is on a busy mainline then they rack up much more quickly than on quieter suburban lines. ² Compensation costs (known as schedule 8 costs) are paid to train and freight operators for the disruption caused by the delay. This is a substantial part of the cost to the industry of cable theft but does not include the cost of staff time to repair and replace the cable, replacement cable itself and the cost of mitigation measures such as security patrols and investment in new technology. The amount of compensation paid depends on the type of services delayed. ³ Total cost comprises schedule 8 (compensation to train operators), as well as the average cost of replacement cable; average maintenance cost of attending to the fault and average opportunity cost of diverting this labour from elsewhere. This figure is available only as a national figure as it is an estimation based on averages. 4 Number of incidents which caused delay to the operational network. It does not include thefts from depots, engineering sites or redundant cable.
5 Year to date—to end of period 5.
Hours delay
2011-12¹ 2,772
2010-11 6,088
2009-10 5,360
2008-09 4,719
¹ Year to date—to end of period 5.

Details of the total number of cable theft crimes, including thefts from depots, engineering sites and depots are collated by BTP for 2010-11.

Crime area name Number of crimes (live and redundant cable) Arrests
London North 321 112
London South 391 94
London Underground 123 77
North Eastern 1,184 273
North Western 273 109
Wales and Western 632 218
Scottish 192 31
Total 3,116 914

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
90625; 538 c917-9W
Session
2010-12
Subjects
Railways Metals Theft
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk