Written question asked by Lord Hain (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 29 February 1996. It was answered by Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) on Thursday, 29 February 1996 on behalf of the Attorney General.
Attorney General
- Question
- What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G13.17 that the ability of the prosecution to introduce evidence within a PII class without making it available to the defence is one-sided.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 17324; 272 c742W;272 c722W
- Session
- 1995-96
- Subjects
- Arms trade Documents Iraq Immunity certificates Public interest Arms to Iraq Inquiry
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 06:11:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_220629
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_220629
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_220629