Skip to main content

Written question asked by Anthony Steen (Conservative), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 10 June 1996. It was answered by John M Taylor (Conservative) on Monday, 10 June 1996 on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry.


Dept of Trade and Industry

Question
What is the estimated annual saving to business from the Deregulation (Rag Flock and Other Filling Materials) Order 1996. - Inc figs.
Answer

Mr. Steen: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what is the estimated annual saving to business from the Deregulation (Rag Flock and Other Filling Materials) Order 1996.[31385] Mr. John M. Taylor: The burdens by this order fall both on suppliers of fillings for beds, furniture and toys and on the manufacturers of such items. In view of the diversity of these industries it has not been possible to construct reliable estimates of the total direct and indirect cost savings the order will achieve. However, one firm, which is the biggest single producer of fillings in the UK, estimates that the cost of testing alone to demonstrate compliance with the rag flock legislation is in its case £4,000 each year. Despite the difficulties associated with determining total figures for the whole industry, informal inquiries have suggested that direct cost savings could be, for the fillings industry alone, over £100,000, for each year after the burdens are removed. Total savings to suppliers and manufacturers should therefore be well in excess of this figure.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
31385; 279 c16W
Session
1995-96
Subjects
Costs Deregulation initiative Materials Wool Statutory instruments