Written question asked by Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 1 December 1992. It was answered by Peter Lloyd (Conservative) on Tuesday, 1 December 1992 on behalf of the Home Office.
Home Office
- Question
- Pursuant to 214 c997-8, if he will set out the grounds on which he considers the Shops Act 1950 to be in abeyance; to comment on the consequences for local authorities. - Inc ref to 207 c367-8.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 215 c99W
- Session
- 1992-93
- Subjects
- Local government Powers Sunday trading
- Legislation
- Shops Act 1950
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2017-01-17 14:46:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_449173
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_449173
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_449173