Written question asked by Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat), in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 1 February 1996. It was answered by Marquess of Salisbury (Conservative) on Thursday, 1 February 1996.
Cranborne, Viscount
- Question
- What changes, if any, have been made in governmental and parliamentary practice and procedure in the light of the decision in Pepper v Hart, enabling the courts to have regard to statements made in Parliament when interpreting the meaning of ambiguous statutory provisions.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 568 c118WA
- Session
- 1995-96
- Subjects
- Legislative process Legislation Statute law Official report Pepper v Hart
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-06-01 13:53:07 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_462402
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_462402
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_462402