Skip to main content

Written question asked by Paul Goggins (Labour) on Tuesday, 8 May 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 9 May 2001. It was answered by Clare Short (Labour) on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 on behalf of the Department for International Development.


Dept for International Development

Question
Statement on what analysis the Government has undertaken of the impact of the Everything But Arms initiative on the Caribbean. - Inc fact that a summary of our analysis will be placed in the Library. (Dep 01/818).
Answer

Mr. Goggins: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what analysis the Government have undertaken of the impact of the Everything But Arms initiative on the Caribbean. [160942] Clare Short: We have carefully considered the impact of the Everything but Arms initiative on all stakeholders. This includes Caribbean countries that are concerned about the possible impact that it might have on their preferential access to EU markets, particularly for sugar, rice and bananas. A summary of our analysis will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses. The analysis shows that none of the Caribbean's sugar industries is expected to suffer a significant deterioration in its financial performance due to EBA. For bananas, the impact will be negligible and for rice, the transition arrangements under EBA will mean that changes in market forces will be phased in gradually and the overall impact will not be very great.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
368 c190W; 160942
Session
2000-01
Subjects
EU external trade Caribbean Bananas Common sugar regime
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk