Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Brightman (Crossbench). It was answered by Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) on Wednesday, 28 March 2001.
Hollis of Heigham, Baroness
- Question
- Whether, having regard to the facts stated during the debate on the Motion that the Social Security Fraud Bill do now pass on 8th March, Part IV of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 ought to be the subject matter of a consolidation Bill.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 624 c264
- Session
- 2000-01
- Oral question type
- Lead
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Legislation
- Social Security Administration Act 1992
- Social Security Fraud Bill (HL) 2000/01
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-04-12 01:07:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_772668
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_772668
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_772668