Skip to main content

Written question asked by John Bercow (Conservative) on Tuesday, 11 December 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 16 January 2002. It was answered by Patricia Hewitt (Labour) on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry.


Dept of Trade and Industry

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if she will make a statement on progress with the public service agreement target on the overall international ranking of the science and engineering company base in terms of quality, relevance and cost-efficiency. - Includes figures. (Printed in Bound Volume on 08.01.2002 at 377 c569-70W)
Answer

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on progress with the public service agreement target on the overall international ranking of the science and engineering company base in terms of quality, relevance and cost- efficiency. [23171] Ms Hewitt: The most recent measurements of the international ranking of the Science and Engineering Base (SEB) in terms of quality, relevance and cost- effectiveness indicate that the UK continues to maintain its position relative to other G7 nations. The details are as follows: The quality of the science and engineering base is measured by the UK's world ranking in terms of citations of published papers. Over the period 1981-2000 the UK received a 9.1 per cent. share of the citations in the international Science Citation Index, second only to the US. The UK was second in `citation shares' for 15 out of 20 scientific fields with the lowest placing being fifth. One measure of relevance is the UK's world ranking in terms of the proportion of university research funding from non- governmental sources. For the latest year for which data are available (1997), the UK was again ranked first among the G7 countries. Cost-effectiveness is measured by the UK's world ranking in terms of the number of papers published per £1 million of public expenditure on science. In 1990, 1993, 1996 and 1999, the UK was the leading country in the G7. For the latest year (2000) the UK was again ranked first. These measures were put in place at the time of the Comprehensive Spending Review and were continued for the period of the 2000 Spending Review (2001-02 to 2003-04). While the public service agreement targets described here provide a valuable indication of the strength of the UK science base relative to our competitors, other indications are also available. The results of the latest Research Assessment Exercise were published on 14 December and show that, since 1996 when the last study was carried out, many university research groups have significantly improved their performance.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
23171; 378 c324-5W;378 c338-9W
Session
2001-02
Subjects
Cost effectiveness Engineering Standards Research Science Trade competitiveness
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk