Written question asked by Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat), in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Monday, 3 February 2003. It was answered by Lord Irvine of Lairg (Labour) on Monday, 3 February 2003.
Irvine of Lairg, Lord
- Question
- Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Chancellor on 7 January 2003 at 642 c167WA, why direct and personal answerability by the Lord Chancellor to Parliament is considered appropriate and necessary for decisions regarding the appointment of Queens Counsel. [HL 1042].
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL 1042; 644 c1WA
- Session
- 2002-03
- Subjects
- Accountability Barristers Public appointments Lord Chancellor's Department Parliament
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-24 22:35:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_818432
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_818432
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_818432