Written question asked by Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat), in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Monday, 19 April 2004. It was answered by Lord Bach (Labour) on Monday, 19 April 2004.
Bach, Lord
- Question
- Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bach on 25 March 2004, 659 c111WA, why, if the Ministry of Defence Police officers understood the law in relation to aggravated trespass, they submitted a file to the Crown Prosecution Service which led to the case of Regina v Lindis Percy at Cirencester magistrates' court, on 4 March, knowing that the defendant had not committed the acts specified in Section 68(1)(a) to (c) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. [HL 2223].
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL 2223; 660 c6-7WA
- Session
- 2003-04
- Subjects
- Military bases Ministry of Defence Police Trespass Acquittals RAF Fairford Percy, Lindis
- Legislation
- Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-11 23:09:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_884760
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_884760
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_884760