Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Annabelle Ewing (Scottish National Party). It was answered on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 on behalf of the Advocate General for Scotland.
Advocate General for Scotland
- Question
- 1st supplementary on whether proposals for a UK supreme court are "unconstitutional".
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 416 c658-9
- Session
- 2003-04
- Oral question type
- 1st Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolution Scotland Supreme Court
- Link
- View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-09-01 23:31:01 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_885486/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_885486/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_885486/-question