Skip to main content

Written question asked by Lord Lansley (Conservative) on Monday, 19 July 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 11 October 2004. It was answered by Baroness Winterton of Doncaster (Labour) on Monday, 11 October 2004 on behalf of the Department of Health.


Dept of Health

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the cost to the taxpayer was of satellite and cable subscriptions in his Department's buildings; if he will list the premium channels that his Department subscribes to. - Including figures and ref to 23 April 2002, 384 c241W and fact that letter in Library.
Answer

Mr. Lansley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the cost to the taxpayer was of satellite and cable subscriptions in his Department's buildings; [185862] (2) if he will list the premium channels that his Department subscribes to. [185863] Ms Rosie Winterton: The Department's building at 79 Whitehall (Richmond House) is connected by cable link to the parliamentary annunciator system from the Palace of Westminster. This link was in place when Richmond House opened in 1988, having first been established in 1969 in a previous headquarters building. The purpose of this is to provide Ministers, their Private Offices and other staff access to debates in the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Currently, this system is free of charge and comes in the form of a package of 24 audio and visual channels, which provide access to a range of broadcast services in addition to the parliamentary channels. Of these, Sky Sports is the only service which would be categorised as a premium channel. Separate from this, the Central Office of Information also provides a link for viewing the parliamentary committee broadcasts, at a current annual cost to the Department of £27,739.40, including VAT. In her reply to a similar question from the hon. Member for South Suffolk (Mr. Yeo) on 23 April 2002, Official Report, column 241W, my hon. Friend the Member for Salford (Ms Blears) attributed this separate charge to the provision of the annunciator system. This was based on wrong advice, arising from a misunderstanding at the time about the operation of the system. I have written to the hon. Member apologising for the mistake and drawing his attention to this reply. A copy of that letter has been placed in the Library.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
425 c139-41W; 185862;185863
Session
2003-04
Subjects
Fees and charges Government departments Television Television channels Satellite broadcasting Department of Health Cable television
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk