Written question asked by Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour) on Friday, 10 September 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 16 September 2004. It was answered by David Jamieson (Labour) on Thursday, 16 September 2004 on behalf of the Department for Transport.
Dept for Transport
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what his Department's interpretation is of the alternative test required by the Habitats Directive when assessing environmental damage that may be created by a deep sea container terminal development proposal.
- Answer
-
Mrs. Dunwoody: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his Department's interpretation is of the alternative test required by the Habitats Directive when assessing environmental damage that may be created by a deep sea container terminal development proposal. [189105] Mr. Jamieson: In line with the European Commission's methodological guidance on the assessment of plans or projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites we take the view that consideration of alternatives is not confined to alternative local sites.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 424 c1717-8W;424 c1715-6W; 189105
- Session
- 2003-04
- Subjects
- Construction Container terminals Environment protection EU law Freight Ports Nature conservation Shipping Natura 2000
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 11:16:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_915677
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_915677
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_915677