Skip to main content

Written question asked by Lord Brady of Altrincham (Conservative) on Thursday, 12 February 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 8 March 2004. It was answered by Nick Raynsford (Labour) on Monday, 8 March 2004 on behalf of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.


Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Question
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what the budget overspend was for each metropolitan authority in each of the last three financial years; and what estimate he has made of budget overspends for the 2003-04 financial year. - Inc table. (Printed on 23.02.2004 in Bound Volume 418 c332-3W).
Answer

Mr. Brady: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the budget overspend was for each metropolitan authority in each of the last three financial years; and what estimate he has made of budget overspends for the 2003-04 financial year. [155994] Mr. Raynsford: The amount by which metropolitan authority spend has exceeded their budget forecast for 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 is as tabled. A negative figure shows that the authority spent less than their budget estimate. No estimate has been made of the budget overspend for the 2003-04 financial year. £000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Barnsley -7,888 -1,702 -9,628 Birmingham -9,905 -6,684 -20,046 Bolton 3,083 -2,094 1,286 Bradford -13,138 -10,875 -3,503 Bury -4,110 -1,352 -2,311 Calderdale -2,249 143 155 Coventry 34,985 11,743 14,953 Doncaster -8,866 -220 -296 Dudley 9 390 -1,836 Gateshead -8,374 14,273 11,780 Kirklees -3,420 -7,468 -4,359 Knowsley -996 -733 2,196 Leeds -5,266 742 -2,778 Liverpool 16,413 5,374 -17,949 Manchester -13,045 -13,071 -12,674 Newcastle upon Tyne -2,440 -1,468 -14,636 North Tyneside 7,410 4,188 4,185 Oldham 496 1,760 514 Rochdale 220 -389 -1,887 Rotherham 2,288 -2,270 276 Salford 666 -549 363 Sandwell -8,208 -7,744 1,179 Sefton -3,987 -2,270 983 Sheffield -3,864 -16,405 -19,471 Solihull -3,359 1,855 -2,353 South Tyneside -4,222 -5,943 -5,264 St. Helens -5,165 -6,956 -2,938 Stockport 1,606 -1,607 -4,647 Sunderland -57,687 -5,254 4,611 Tameside -3,695 -8,349 -819 Trafford -19,111 -2,197 454 Wakefield -8,581 -3,063 7,077 Walsall 919 -4,653 -2,226 Wigan -7,581 -5,575 -611 Wirral 1,223 -1,057 1,855 Wolverhampton -13,473 -9,636 -2,462 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Notes: The data are taken from the RA budget and RS outturn forms for each year. The large under spend figure for Sunderland for 2000-01 is mainly attributable to a revenue receipt of £53.9 million in March 2001 being included in their accounts for that year.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
418 c1225-6W;418 (Not in Bound Volume); 155994
Session
2003-04
Subjects
Local government finance Metropolitan districts
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk