Proceeding contribution from Brian Jenkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 June 2005. It occurred during Adjournment debate on MG Rover.
MG Rover
My difficulty is that I can remember the events unfolding. As far as I recollect, until the time when the Chinese walked out of the room, the bridging loan was in place; the condition of the bridging loan was that the Chinese should sign the agreement. However, it was not just another loan; it was not just more money being pumped into the company. If I believed for a moment that a company whose directors knew it to be insolvent was apparently being given the backing of the Government, with an extra loan, to continue hoodwinking all its suppliers and its workers, I would be seriously concerned. Apparently, they are damned if they do and damned if they do not. Which is it?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 435 c40WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Insolvency Government assistance Rover Group Phoenix Consortium Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:45:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_251230
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_251230
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_251230