Proceeding contribution from Jim Cunningham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 June 2005. It occurred during Adjournment debate on MG Rover.
MG Rover
: The hon. Gentleman is jumping from blaming the DTI to blaming someone else, while persuading us that we need an inquiry. There is something that I do not understand: around November, Government officials were in China and discussions were taking place. From then to May it was six or seven months. How long does it take, in such a situation, to know whether the business can or cannot be done? My understanding is that the Chinese were not interested after they found out that there were certain problems with the company. As for the loan that was always available, how long is a piece of string? Why jump in and out of blaming the DTI or others? The hon. Gentleman should confine himself to his original premise. Let us have an inquiry, and cut out all the rumour and innuendo, because I know no better than the hon. Gentleman does what really happened.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 435 c41WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Insolvency Government assistance Rover Group Phoenix Consortium Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:45:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_251232
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_251232
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_251232