Proceeding contribution from Nick Palmer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
As my right hon. Friend knows, I very much welcome the direction of the Bill, and I have previously introduced a private Member’s Bill on airguns. On the specific issue of replica weapons, there is a slight difference of emphasis between clauses 30 and 31. Clause 30 stresses the need to avoid replicas that can be confused with genuine weapons, whereas clause 31 considers the possibility of allowing such replicas in circumstances that the Home Secretary may specify. He mentions an exemption for airsoft as one possibility. May I suggest that, when a specific club seeks such an exemption, it would be possible to allow some kind of registration procedure, so that people can prove that they are members of a re-enactment society, club or whatever, as a condition for owning such weapons?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 435 c555
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Airguns Licensing Firearms Imitation firearms Licensed premises Drunkenness Misuse Offensive weapons Public order offences Sales Schools Young people Sexual offences Right of search Drinking banning orders Alcohol disorder zones Night-time economy
- Legislation
- Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 21:21:44 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_252501
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_252501
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_252501