Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Winterton of Doncaster (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 July 2005. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Dr. Ghosh.


Dr. Ghosh

: The head of corporate affairs carried out the investigation and reported to the tribunal. That was in accordance with the regulations. A number of current and former members of Dr. Ghosh's staff were interviewed. The interim findings led to the extension of Dr Ghosh's suspension until the investigation is complete and any decisions dependent on it are reached. I am told that the investigation has now reached its conclusions and that a panel meeting is to be held on 19 July to discuss the results of the investigation and to reach a decision. My hon. Friend asked whether a solicitor could be present. Under the guidance issued by the Department, neither the PCT nor Dr. Ghosh can have at the panel meeting a solicitor who comments directly. However, his solicitor can certainly attend the meeting with him to observe. Ministers are not empowered to intervene between a trust and a doctor on the matter of the performers list, because primary care trusts are independent organisations. However, Dr. Ghosh will have a right of appeal to an independent tribunal if he is not satisfied with the outcome of the hearing on 19 July. In addition, if he chooses to go to appeal and that appeal fails, he will be able to go to judicial review. My hon. Friend made it clear that he was dissatisfied with the locum provision. I have been informed that locum cover arrangements were put in place and that those involve the use of a locum previously approved by Dr Ghosh. The arrangements have meant that it has been possible to cover his practice on all but a small number of occasions. I understand that Dr. Ghosh was contacted about the allegations of racism that were investigated by the trust. That is obviously a difficult situation and I understand my hon. Friend's concerns. However, I think that the trust has followed procedure as laid down in NHS guidance. I hope that I have been able to outline the alternatives that Dr. Ghosh will have if he is not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation and the hearing on 19 July.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
436 c130-1WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Doctors Misconduct Ghosh, Jayanti
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk