Proceeding contribution from Geoffrey Hoon (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 November 2005. It occurred during Legislative debate on Legislative debate.
European Union (Accessions) Bill
With the leave of the House, I shall deal with the one point that has been raised. Nominations to replace retiring trustees have come forward in the usual way. In fact, there is no legal obligation to consult any particular organisation, but we do take account of that point when there are new regulations under the scheme. A retired Members association would be an appropriate body to consult in such circumstances. I hope that my hon. Friend the Member for Carlisle (Mr. Martlew) recognises, however, that the trustees’ work is quite onerous. I pay tribute to the right hon. Member for Hitchin and Harpenden and disagree with his modesty. He does understand these arrangements, as I have learned to my cost in correspondence with him. It is important that the House have such expertise available to it, and I pay tribute to him and to the other trustees who do such important work for us. Given that the hon. Member for Somerton and Frome (Mr. Heath) set such a good example, I shall not detain the House any longer.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 438 c798-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- House of Commons Commission Cormack, Lord Blencathra, Lord
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:27:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273101
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273101
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273101