Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on NHS Redress Bill [HL].


NHS Redress Bill [HL]

I, too, am grateful to the Minister for her reply. Coherence and certainty are always prayed in aid by Ministers when defending the wording of a Bill. Who am I to argue with that? The problem is that we are still uncertain how reasonableness will be defined in practice here and the extent to which assistance will be available. I take on board the Government’s intention to strengthen ICAS so that it can deliver the service. The other half of the question is: what will the patient be entitled to? What can I as a patient expect from the system and when can I shout that the system is not delivering what is reasonable? I cannot quite get a feel for how extensive a service will be on offer. No doubt we can return to these matters at a later stage, if appropriate. For now, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 51 to 53 not moved.] On Question, Whether Clause 9 shall stand part of the Bill?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c404-5GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Civil proceedings Hospitals Legal representation NHS Patients Payments Negligence Solicitors Time limits Torts Patient advice and liaison services Health Service Commissioner NHS Litigation Authority Independent complaints advocacy services
Legislation
NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk