Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on NHS Redress Bill [HL].
NHS Redress Bill [HL]
I thank the Minister for that reply. Amendment No. 62 is unnecessary if the clause is not ambiguous. If the clause is ambiguous, then some amendment is necessary. Nevertheless, I shall take away what the noble Baroness said and study it carefully. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 63 to 65 not moved.] Clauses 12 and 13 agreed to. Clause 14 [Complaints]: [Amendment No. 66 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c420-1GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Compensation Civil proceedings Hospitals Legal representation NHS Patients Payments Negligence Solicitors Time limits Torts Patient advice and liaison services Health Service Commissioner NHS Litigation Authority Independent complaints advocacy services
- Legislation
- NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:28:28 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279181
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279181
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279181